The bankruptcy of Darwinism

The ball on the 10th floor does not yet follow from the bounce of the ball, especially if we call the law that takes it there speculation!

Justification

From a neutral cell, a previously non-existent organism of any species can only be bred by purposeful and prolonged selection for species, while natural selection always selects for further reproduction those best adapted to the environment. And the best-adapted cells strengthen the lineage of cells in which the best-adapted are selected. For example: - selecting for the best adapted cows will only strengthen the lineage of the best adapted cows, but this selection strategy will not breed a Holstein-Friesian breed, because it requires selection for breed traits, which nature cannot do without awareness. And if nature cannot breed a Holstein-Friesian cow, it cannot breed any cow from any neutral cell. This is the difference between spontaneous natural selection and conscious artificial selection or breeding.Hence, from the ancient LUCA cell, nature can only breed the best adapted LUCA cells, not the millions of species that Darwinian evolutionists falsely claim.

Question

If you CANNOT breed Holstein-Friesian cows from the most environmentally adapted cows, how did you evolve different, previously non-existent organisms with specific breed characteristics from the most environmentally adapted ancestral cells /LUCA/? If you can't answer, then you prove the bankruptcy of Darwinian evolution!

See in detail:

Banana peel on which darwinism slips

https://darhiwum.blogspot.com/2024/04/banana-peel-on-which-darwinism-slips.html