The Achilles' heel of materialist biology

 


Science has an answer to everything!?

The certainty of the statement refers to the statement itself, not to the fact of the statement. This is what the theory built on evolutionary foundations is about. There are serious deficiencies in the schema, which are made noticeable by rattling a logical chain presented as real, which in their terminology means functioning. But if one or more links are missing, how does the bicycle move?

They keep pedaling and insist that it works. But what if the magnified essential shortcomings show that it doesn't work! Merely pedaling the chain does not prove the bicycle is moving, because the chain links are incomplete. And they can't work either if we scrutinize the so-called evidence.

The discontinuity of the chain

In materialist reasoning, the winding of the chain (the explanation of subprocesses like mutation or chemical bonds) is just idling if the chain is not connected to the wheel (the origin of the entire system and consciousness).

They sell 'chain rattling' as progress. They claim that because the pedal turns (there is evolutionary change), the bicycle also moves forward (life and meaning are explained). But if the essential links – the source of information, the coded software, and subjective consciousness – are missing, then the bicycle stands still. 

The 'next time' is the typical procrastination tactic: materialism always pushes the proof into the future, while in the present it already behaves as if it owns the ultimate truth. The expressions 'developing explanation' and 'incomplete model' actually issue a blank check to the future: 'We don't know yet, but physics will explain it later.' This is really not science, but an incomplete scheme disguised as a functioning system. 

The 'Great Generator' logic looks at the entire system, not just the rattling of the links. Behind actual progress (the emergence of complexity), there must be a driving force (intelligence).

The Evolutionary Misinterpretation of Natural Selection

Natural selection is essentially unnatural selection, and the unnatural is always the first step when we talk about the formation of a system. If we claim that order arose from disorder, in this case, if the first step is disorderly, it must be selected out (discarded) before we proceed. Therefore, the first step must be orderly, and if it is orderly, this proves intelligence.

Selection can only preserve something that already works.

The compulsion of 'functioning': If a system (for example, a cell or a protein) does not reach the minimally functional level (order) from the very first moment, selection does not 'further develop' it, but immediately discards it as a defective product.

Chaos does not wait:
Disorder (unnatural/non-functional state) is not given time by fate to 'maybe be good in a billion years.' If the first step is not practical and ordered, the evolutionary chain does not even get started.

The priority of intelligence: Therefore, if a working system exists, its first steps must already have carried the order and information that made it viable in the environment. 'Orderliness' thus does not arise at the end of the process, but is a prerequisite of the process.

Accordingly, selection is not the 'organizer' but only the 'quality controller.' But if there is no intelligent plan (Great Generator) that places the first, already ordered piece on the conveyor belt, then there is nothing to check. Only chaos can be selected from chaos.

We can call this the principle of the "irreducible beginning": what does not work immediately is lost.

This fact is the Achilles' heel of materialist biology. If "viability" is the condition for selection, then selection cannot create viability – since it requires it.

The three points of the logical impasse:

1. The threshold of “functioning”: A machine part (or a protein) does not work at 10%. It either performs its function or is defective. If from disorder (chaos) a “nearly good” chain accidentally comes together, natural selection will not “pity” it and preserve it for the future. Since at that moment it provides no advantage, and even wastes energy, the system will ruthlessly discard it. Therefore, order must be ready from the very first moment for selection to even “see” it.

2. Information precedes physical form: If the first step must be organized, that means the function (the purpose) already existed as a 'plan' before the matter came together. The cell must 'know' how to distribute energy before the first membrane closes. This 'knowledge' does not come from the weight of atoms, but from an intelligent program that gives direction to the matter.

3. Statistical death: If we expect an orderly first step from chaos, we encounter a probability wall that not even the age of the universe can overcome. The 'random' assembly of a single functional protein is mathematically impossible, let alone that of an entire system. If we are here nonetheless, it proves that the first step did not come from 'nothing,' but an Intelligent Cause (Great Generator) placed order into matter.

Conclusion

Materialism fails because it places 'order' at the end of the process, whereas logically, order must be at the beginning of the process. Natural selection can only polish the already existing order, but the order itself was coded into the system by the Background intelligence. Therefore, the 'bicycle' did not become what it is from pedaling; it is pedalable because someone designed it as a bicycle.

Information (order) cannot be the result of evolution, because it itself is the trigger of evolution. This is the first step of functionality, its most essential requirement.

As for the Bible, it was inspired by the same One who programmed the trees to shed their leaves in the fall and come alive again in the spring. That is why He created the moon, to bring about the seasons.

The Moon's gravity 'supports' the Earth. It is like a weight: it prevents the Earth's axis from wobbling uncontrollably. Without the Moon, our axial tilt would change drastically, causing unmanageable climate changes.

Just because someone canno
t understand the system does not mean that one should question the system's organization by an underlying intelligence.

Do not let yourself be misled, deceived, or harmed. God's plan in the Bible for every person is eternal life on a paradisiacal earth /oikumenén/, where we were originally created to be. This is at stake in how you decide your own destiny and future!

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life... For He did not subject the coming earth
 (oikumenén), about which we speak, to angels." (Gospel of John 3:16; Hebrews 2:5)


Nincsenek megjegyzések:

Megjegyzés küldése

The scientific refutation of darwinian evolution