The condemnation of atheism

 

The basic question is: - Where did the first subjects of the initial organisms capable of evolution come from, which could not have been created by evolution, because then evolution would have created its own capability by evolution?- Where did the capabilities come from by which the alleged evolution takes place? How can evolution ensure this, when it depends on their existence?! So the subjects of evolution must first be created. Darwinism has already failed here!

In principle, any previously non-existent species can/should be bred from a single stem cell [LUCA - protobacterium] only and only by long-term controlled selection for a species trait - as in artificial selection, special species are bred under constant supervision - but the unguided operation of natural selection is "essentially a random wandering in the field of genetic possibilities" /Stephen Hawking/, is aimed at selecting the most viable individuals of existing species, not at selection for species, and thus it is not possible to evolve basic species by a blind evolutionary mechanism, on which the evolutionary mechanism can exert its influence by inducing flexible adaptation to the natural environment. And there is not one such species, but millions!

Intelligence was not given to us to turn a vile version of it against the one who gave us the quality original. Behind intelligent phenomena there is always a spirituality, a mind, a person, according to its degree, as is proved by the spirit of the atheist who in his speech /or writing/ uses intelligence against God. 

So, understanding comes from understandability, and the more intelligence one puts into the process of understandability, the more intelligence there must be in what one wants to conquer. And this he does by intelligence. He puts intelligence into the fathoming of events that reflect intelligence.

From this it is only a step to the acceptance of the possessor of intelligence by faith, which places intelligent people in the class of believers. In the other class are people without faith who have traded the intelligence found in the universe for chance. They got here by accident, which they make no secret of, that there are meaningless, purposeless mechanical processes behind their existence.

An atheist walks into a room where every object that exists has a purpose and a function. Only the existence of the atheist has none. So what is he doing in the room? Get out of it! The smallest object with a purpose has more value than him!

Whoever uses intelligence against God is in fact proving God, because to scientifically prove the denial of God, he must use the same degree of intelligence that is in the very thing he wants to deny, understand or conquer. Where there is intelligence there is a conscious mind, where there is a conscious mind there is a person. And in the universe, there is intelligence on an amazing scale, there is conscious mind, there is God! 

"It is the deep emotional conviction of the presence of a supreme reasoning power manifesting itself in the incomprehensible universe that shapes my conception of God.... "In the laws of nature there is an intelligence so supreme that the reasonableness of human thought and system is a pale reflection in comparison!" /Albert Einstein: Mein Weltbild.  - Published by C. Seeling, Zurich-Stuttgart-Vienna 1953. 21.1/

If the materialists are forced to use intelligence against what they want to refute, then since their own intelligence is evidence of their existence, what they are fighting against is evidence of the existence of the other side, i.e. God, whose intelligence has much greater visible results than the atheist's claim. There is no such thing as having to use intelligence against something that does not have a shred of intelligence, if it does, then the materialists are insane for stating their position!

Functional intelligence cannot be inferred from scientific studies of a given material base because it is not revealed by the material of the base, but only by the relative position of the material parts, i.e. the functioning of a central purpose that serves a purpose. And to recognise this requires intelligence, for which scientific tools are not sufficient. But whoever denies this invisible background intelligence ultimately denies his own, because he does not recognize its existence.

It is an absolute double standard to infer some unidentified but factually existing cause from the delay of a clock, the slow movement of the hands, and nothing from the complex construction of the clock, except that its existence is explained in an evident manner by the components that make up the clock. /(Or rather, they don't explained!)

An atheist believes that there is no God. If he had a brain, he would rely on it, but since he doesn't, he relies on his faith. More specifically, his credulity. Whoever uses intelligence to deny (not disprove - it makes a difference!) a higher intelligence than his own, is also torpedoing his own earthbound intelligence! If there is no intelligence in the universe, how can there be in a few measly sentences? There is no way!

It is not the lack of evidence that makes an atheist an atheist, but the attitude to the evidence available. They have not found God because they are not worthy to find him.

The atheist has rights, which he openly asserts. If God is the one who is going to break down their rights against God, then where do they go to express their rights? Atheism is an arbitrary formulation of rights to commit any wrongdoing. The emphasis is not on rejecting God, but on accepting the consequences of rejecting God. Atheism is self-righteousness, the persistent need to run the ego above all else.

How does the atheist measure primitiveness? With oneself. Anyone who performs above this level can no longer be an atheist. How much intelligence is required for atheism? The other way around. It's just that the rest has to be taken away. It is not necessary to prove the existence of God, but to point out the unconcealed antipathy in man, which already explains the lack of belief in God on the part of the atheist. Godlessness is the aftermath of a failed age in which atheist society revels.

What else don't atheists believe in, like the cocoa doorbell? People confuse free will with atheism, because atheism is practiced before you choose, because you choose based on it.

Atheist in intelligently designed sentence claims not to believe in Intelligent Designer. His sentence is grammatically intelligent, but to deny design by planned word association is materialistic schizophrenia.

The atheist escapes the god loop by crawling into the noose of unbelief. Which, of course, does not save him when the noose is around his neck. As God is outside time, so is the barbarism of atheism outside intelligence.

The reasons for atheism are not in the reasons that are made public, because they are only pretexts. The real motive is that the atheist wants to live without God. If the atheist is the second step, then he can only be a meaningful product of the first step, regardless of his ignorance of the origin of the first step. He cannot be a first step because he has an origin, and existence does not come from him. It is not the originator of being, but the beneficiary of being. And a beneficiary cannot be a denier of ether unless it wants to live independently of ether. This is the essence of atheism.

Atheism basically means to formulate a right to a completely autonomous moral way of life, in which no one has a say! [Of course, the more atheists there are, the more differently they imagine and live this.] From this basic position it follows that atheists are unable to accept an intelligence /Istent/ above them which imposes moral limits on them, and which does not, is indifferent to them. This clearly shows that for atheists, it is not the question of God that is important, but the supremacy of moral freedom. Which of course can lead to extremely vile abuses, as 6,000 years of bloody human history shows.

If you give me a magnifying glass, I'll look for the social ennobling effect of the value of atheistic philosophy, but I'd rather have an electron microscope. It would find nothing but wall-rotting saltpetre and mould. 

Atheism is an arbitrary violation of the cohesive moral order of society, and every self-righteous atheist claims the right to exercise his own libertarianism. All law-breaking rioters, burglars, or serial killers have a conception of life based on the same self-interested moral libertinism, according to each one's individual interpretation, temperament or taste.

The atheist is stuck not only on what or who God is, but also on what is the truth? Or rather, what is the truth for whom? In atheism, a lie can be truth without further ado, and can be sold as truth despite its falsehood. Is it any wonder, then, that they have no idea what to do with the recognition of God. They cannot recognize it because they think according to their own interests.

To be an atheist is to be unable to believe in God in the absence of evidence - in reality a cover-up for not wanting to. But the pretence works better if you give it a scientific veneer as to why you reject it. It makes his objection look intellectual. But this is sheer self-deception, since his denial is far beyond what the facts he does not know could objectively justify.

Denial is cutting the moral leash that God is behind. You cannot liquidate God /few people engage in active attack, liquidation of God/, but the leash is liquidated. The ostensible reason for this liquidation is the lack of proof of God, the real reason is the desire for, the acquisition of, complete moral independence.

Atheism is rooted in a lack of willingness, which for him is the path he has paved for himself with his approach to life and his way of life. But he can be sure that he cannot be sure of the non-existence of God, in which case he faces the inevitability of judgment. The greatest obstacle the atheist can throw in the way of God is himself! Man's greatest enemy is his own atheistic ego.

An atheist is under the law just like anyone else. He must breathe, eat, drink and defecate. But to turn the excrement of his brain against the One who programmed his anatomical and spiritual faculties - this brazen rebellion was not allowed him! He will fall under the judgment of God, against which the big vest and the mouth that bellows nonsense and the evil heart will not protect him, but identify who we are up against!

Psalm 1:5 Therefore the unrighteous shall not stand in judgment; and the wicked in the audience of the righteous.

If there were no reference, the atheist would not be able to speak. And since there is no scientific basis for denying God, he is content with the rhetoric that satisfies his peers with subjective outbursts. Subjective opinion is a gunshot without a bullet. Subjective opinion is a gunshot without a bullet. What is the point of spotting an inflated balloon? It is tantamount to disturbing the silence!

With such thinking, can you trust the mind and credibility of an atheist? Hardly! The only guarantee is to adhere to the guiding standard declared by the transcendent power that governs the universe, and to measure everything against it. Then you cannot be mistaken about anything, because in obedience to it everything and everyone fulfils its purpose of existence. Guidelines that stray far from it are absolutely unreliable and are breeding grounds for various chaos philosophies and inevitable failures.

Just as the cinematographer projects the film onto the screen, God projects the universe onto space. The atheist does nothing but remove himself from this screen, claiming that he is made of space junk. Only to be free to chuckle at his own pleasure, to satisfy his own pleasures. He makes a law for himself so that he can subject others to that law.

The atheist willingly jumps into the well when he is flaunting his disbelief, but he hasn't reached the bottom yet. For now, he enjoys flying. But he won't like the bang at the end. He believed there was no God, but he pocketed all that God gave him. And when God takes it all away in the end, his pocket is empty. He is as empty as his own head, because he has not seen that he has received all that from God. Atheism is the belief in non-belief. So you categorically deny something you have no evidence against.

Facing the judging Jesus Christ

- Don't threaten an atheist with "going to hell" because they don't believe that. It's like threatening an adult that Santa Claus won't bring him a present for Christmas.- It doesn't matter how the atheist reacts to the arguments against him, the point is that confronting him with them is a legal basis for judging him. Its like the railroad at the turn signal, if you ignore it, the railroad company is not to blame if the train runs over the fool.

- I cannot believe in something, something that has not been proven to exist. To me, the Bible and God are nothing more than a fairy tale. Until there is proof, the Bible is a fictional book from antiquity. It is everyone's heart to decide what they believe, for me it is important that everyone respects each other's beliefs or atheism.

It is not lack of faith that is the problem, it is that your non-belief is accompanied by theft, fraud, lying, violence, vandalism, money laundering, internet crime, drug and prostitution abuse, everyday littering, and thousands of other evil acts as we see the immense tide of crime, all of whose perpetrators live by their own morality and expect to be respected for their atheistic outlook on life. God will respect it, won't he? He will judge them all severely.

Jeremiah 23:19 Behold, the wind of the LORD will blow with great wrath, and a whirlwind will rain down on the heads of the wicked.

God does not have democracy, but shearing atheists like sheep. The face of the atheist will be priceless when Jesus Christ returns. They will get the proof they have been longing for all their lives! Shooting at God dolls at the amusement park may seem like fun, but the true God is waiting for them at the exit. Atheists will spit on God until God sends their spittle back at them, which they will drown in. In fact, they deserve God's wrath for rejecting the obvious truth that creation exists because it has a Creator!

Atheism begins with resignation to death. The refutation of atheism strikes a blow at the intellectual side of atheism, leaving only unintelligent, stupid atheism. If it can't hide behind evolution, its open nakedness will show. Stubbornness in the immoral pleasure of sin remains. Only God can remove this by eliminating such people if they refuse to repent. They have resigned themselves to eternal death anyway, so God will give them what they have already committed to themselves.

What is the difference between a believer and an atheist? A believer is willing to submit to God's judgment, while an atheist is reluctant to accept judgment until the last moment.

2Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive his reward or punishment for what he has done, whether good or bad, in his earthly life.

2 Thessalonians 1:7-9 ... when the Lord Jesus appears from heaven with the angels of his power. In a flame of fire who takes vengeance on those who do not know God and who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.

Hebrews 10:30-31 For we know him who said: Vengeance is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord. ...It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

2 Peter 2:9 The Lord is able to deliver the righteous from temptation, and to reserve the wicked for punishment in the day of judgment.

Zephaniah 1:14-18 The great day of the Lord [is] near, [it is] near, and hasteth greatly, [even] the voice of the day of the Lord: the mighty man shall cry there bitterly.That day [is] a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness, A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers. And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the Lord: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung. Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the Lord's wrath;

Matthew 24:21-22 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.

Isaiah 55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth; it shall not return unto me void, but it shall do that which I will, and it shall prosper whithersoever I send it, - saith Almighty God.