The pearls of the atheist creed

 The truth of the Bible does not depend on the ridiculous unbelief of dilettante atheists.

Ezekiel 18:23 Will I delight in the death of the wicked, says the Lord God, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live? 

2Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise, as some consider slowness, but is patient with you, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

I DON'T WANT TO BELIEVE IN YOUR SADISTIC GOD, BUT THAT'S NOT THE REASON FOR MY DISBELIEF. YOU EITHER BELIEVE IN SOMETHING OR YOU'RE NOT CONVINCED, RELIGION HAS YET TO MEET THE BURDEN OF PROOF, SO I'M NOT GOING TO BELIEVE IN SOMETHING WITHOUT A GOOD REASON, AND SO FAR NO ONE HAS PROVIDED THE NECESSARY EVIDENCE. 

An atheist wants strong evidence of God that condemns him for not believing in Him until now. But the atheist will never accept such evidence against himself, for he has no humility, but satanic pride, which has begun the rebellion against God. The atheists just keep on doing it!

In this question /is there a God or not/ it is not the existence or non-existence of god that is important, the story is not about that, but WHY there is NO god, because they believe there certainly is not: that is the essence of atheism, the denial of god, based on a variety of subjective excuses.

The atheist actually WANTS TO LIVE WITHOUT GOD, according to his own moral laws. And the main message of his own moral law is the rejection of God.

Here is a string of pearls of reasons:

"AFTER COMING INTO CONTACT WITH A RELIGIOUS PERSON, I ALWAYS FEEL I HAVE TO WASH MY HANDS" - FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE 

Jesus says: John 15:3 You are already clean because of the teaching I have given you. - This purity does not apply to Friedrich Nietzsche. Washing his hands won't help him.

It is difficult to disinfect the minds of those in whose heads Nietzsche's nonsense has become ingrained.

NATURE IS REAL, GODS ARE IMAGINARY. ALL GODS ARE IMAGINARY.

A completely uneducated atheist considers him a figment of the imagination, about whom Nobel Prize-winning physicist Max Planck says: "As a man who has devoted his whole life to the purest science, the study of matter, I can say, as a result of my research on atoms, that matter as such does not exist! All matter comes into being and exists only because of a force that makes the particles of the atom vibrate and holds this smallest solar system of the atom together. Behind this force we must assume the existence of a conscious and intelligent spirit. This mind is the matrix of all matter." /Das Wesen der Materie [The Nature of Matter], speech in Florence, Italy (1944) (in Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 11 Planck, No. 1797)/

If the atheist is unable /or rather unwilling to recognize this, that matter is a derivative of consciousness/, then any further discussion with him is completely useless, because his consciousness is a derivative of matter, influenced by the demand for rights to exercise the moral freedom of his body-dominated thinking to such an extent that he has lost his realistic judgment of the facts. Proverbs 14:7 Avoid the foolish, for you will not find reasoning with him.

You really have to take this seriously, because he thinks he knows better!

According to them, atheism is the result of their critical and sceptical thinking about the supposed existence of "gods" - while endowing matter with intelligence so that they can dominate matter, so that personal divine intelligence cannot dominate them. For man can rule matter, but he cannot rule the intelligent God. Therefore matter is the ultimate reality for them and not God.

Science teachers have many misconceptions about the theory of evolution because they cannot follow the corrections that are set by the presiding jugglers.

In particular, one should not get into an evolution debate with atheists, because the philosophy of evolution is all about pushing their own view at all costs /that they are right even if their arguments are refuted!/, while looking down on anyone who does not believe what they do! What they represent is pseudo-scientific arrogance, arrogance and a sense of superiority. 

The anti-God pride of atheism reflects the spirit of the biblical Satan, who said, "I will ascend into heaven, I will set my throne above the stars of God, and I will dwell on the mountain of the church in the far north.  I will ascend to the high clouds and become like the Most High. But you will go down to the grave, to the depths of the pit" (Isaiah 14:13-15).

The Bible gives a perfect definition of cause and effect: "These things I say, and testify in the Lord, that you walk no more as the Gentiles walk in the vanity of their minds. Their minds are darkened, and in their ignorance they are alienated from the life according to God, which is in them because of the hardness of their hearts, whose moral sense is dulled, and they have given themselves over to lustfulness, and for the sake of gain they do all kinds of unclean things." (Ephesians 4:17-19)

Here is the sequence of steps: 

the futility of the mind /it imagines it rules the world, while the atomic and biological world is under divine programming, so atheists are under the same laws/;

Intellectual darkness /the whole universe and existence itself are presented as purposeless and meaningless, and from that they derive human death as a necessary good/; 

the ignorance resulting from the narrowing of judgement /which causes them to reject all transcendent guidance to express their self-interested self-rule/; 

hard-heartedness /the heart is the seat of motives and emotions - Proverbs 4:23 "More than anything that is feared, guard your heart, for out of it [all] life proceeds" - hardening of the heart results in ingrained self-interested thinking, which is the primary motivator; 

the blurring of the moral sense /loss of the ability to distinguish between natural and unnatural boundaries, deliberate rejection, overriding/; 

shamelessness /uninhibited exercise of sexual freedom, the need for entitlement, which can be taken out into the street/;

profit-seeking /which takes many forms, not only sexual./

Just one example: - all the hackers in the world who flood the world with fake, fraudulent emails to exploit others financially or morally - are all stone-cold atheists who reject God's laws!!!

There is no such thing as a Christian hacker, only an atheist, because if someone is a Christian and still a hacker, he has denied Christianity!

Last year, one in two emails sent around the world was a fraudulent email: cybercrime will have consumed $7000 billion in 2022. Every month, one and a half million malicious websites are created by fraudsters, - said information security expert Áron Tanos.- In two minutes, 10.8 million forints were stolen from their accounts. - https://rtl.hu/gazdasag/2023/09/22/bank-csalas-10-millio-mbh-bank

Because what is the main command of the Bible?

"Master, which is the great commandment in the law? And Jesus answered: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the first and great commandment. The second is similar: Love your neighbour as yourself. Upon these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets... Render therefore to every man his due: to whomsoever a tax is due, to whomsoever a duty is due, to whomsoever a fear is due, to whomsoever a reverence is due, to whomsoever a reverence is due, to whomsoever a reverence is due, to whomsoever a reverence is due. Owe nothing to anyone, but only to love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law. For this: Thou shalt not commit fornication, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covet - and if there is any other commandment - is summed up in this verse, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love does no wrong to your neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfilling of the law." (Matthew 27:36-40; Romans 13:7-10)

What does the atheistic spirit say to this? "God performed a miracle" seems like an unassuming, primitive, and lazy solution. I really reject the idea that anyone who uses such a solution would impose moral obligations on me, on everyone.

Do you want to drive on a motorway where everyone drives their car according to their own morals and refuses to obey the traffic police's rules of the road? Because we live in a world where the interests of atheism prevail! God-given conscience is an obstacle, a restraining force, but the laws of atheism override this.

Where does atheism come from? It may surprise many, but that's where it started:

"Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field that the Lord God had made, and he asked the woman: Did God indeed say that you should not eat of any tree of the garden? The woman answered the serpent, 'We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden. But of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, God said, 'You shall not eat of it, nor touch it, lest you die. And the serpent said to the woman, Ye shall not surely die. But God knows that the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." (Genesis 3:1-5)

So you become your own gods, you decide what is right and what is wrong. In common parlance, "they reject all transcendent guidance to express their self-interested self-rule" - Put quite simply, they do not allow God to dictate the moral law for them, but determine it for themselves.- They claim that since there is no God, there is no ultimate basis for ethics.

In the final analysis, atheism is a rebellion against God's moral order, a form of moral debauchery that has gained widespread currency in society because it is an easy source of pleasure for depraved human nature. To counter this, it also rejects the idea that it has a depraved nature. Rather, he presents liberalism, the breaking of barriers, as the progress of society.

The only result of this way of life is nature, and within it, total self-destruction - which is what we see happening on the world stage.

This 6,000 year adventure is well described in the Bible, giving us an accurate vision of human thinking alienated from God, where it leads and what God's solution to this problem is.

["Scholars generally agree that the earliest form of writing appeared in Mesopotamia (in what is now Iraq) almost 5,500 years ago."-  https://www.bl.uk/history-of-writing/articles/where-did-writing-begin

"The earliest civilisations emerged between 4000 and 3000 BC, ... first in Mesopotamia (in what is now Iraq) and then in Egypt."-https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/key-components-civilization/]

If there is no God, people will solve their problems. But if there is, God will solve the human factor that causes the problems.

THE CONCEPT OF "GOD" HAS BEEN GIVEN SO MANY DIFFERENT MEANINGS THAT IT CAN HARDLY BE CONSIDERED OBJECTIVELY EXISTENT.

The concept of "life" has been given so many meanings /in scientific literature/ that, according to the atheist's interpretation above, it can hardly be considered objectively existent.

THE DEFINITION OF "GOD" IS SO VAGUE THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHAT IT IS. HOW CAN YOU PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS? ON THE ONE HAND, PEOPLE SAY THAT GOD IS A PERSON - A CONSCIOUS BEING WITH THE CAPACITY TO ACT - AND ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY SAY IT IS INFINITE AND BEYOND TIME. LOGICALLY, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE BOTH.

„What is life? This is among the most difficult open problems in science, right up there with the nature of consciousness and the existence of matter. All the definitions we have fall short. None help us understand how life originates…” - https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/646981/life-as-no-one-knows-it-by-sara-imari-walker/

HOW CAN YOU PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS? 

Is life logically impossible because you don't know what it is? Rather, the rational thinking of the atheist is impossible! Proverbs 14:7 Avoid the fool, for you will not find reasoning with him.

THERE IS NO SIMPLER TRUTH THAN THAT I AM NOT CONVINCED BY FICTION.

Yet how are we convinced by the fact of biogenesis, by the self-evolution of DNA?

"The origin of life is the deepest mystery of all science. What is known about the origin of life remains a mystery; the deepest remains when chemists and biochemists ask.... There is a huge gulf between the simplest living cell and the most complex mixture of naturally occurring inanimate chemicals. We have no idea when, how and where this gap was crossed... There is the RNA-world hypothesis, which posits that before life was based on DNA and proteins, the world had only RNA, which acted as both a replicator and an enzyme. But in fact, there is no good theory that explains how we can go from a soup of amino acids and nucleotides to a living organism in a world of RNA locked in a cell wall."- Prof. Dr. Cebo Daniel, Cyberbiology Security and Artificial Intelligence Biology Researcher - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/opinion-origin-life-biggest-unanswered-question-biology-cebo

"In fact, as Miller's experiments have shown, it is not difficult to create amino acids. The much bigger challenge is creating nucleic acids - the building blocks of molecules like RNA and DNA. The origin of life lies in the origin of these "replicators", molecules that can make copies of themselves... "Even if it can produce amino acids (and nucleic acids) under soupy conditions, this has little or no effect on the origin of life." /Scientists complete a 53-year-old classic experiment on the origin of life - https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/scientists-finish-a-53-year-old-classic-experiment-on-the-origins-of-life

"The origin of life is one of the most difficult problems in science, but also one of the most important. The search for the origin of life has developed into a lively interdisciplinary field, but other scientists are often sceptical, even derisive. This attitude is understandable and, in a sense, perhaps justified, given the 'dirty', seldom-mentioned secret: despite many interesting results, if judged by the simple criterion of reaching (or even approaching) the ultimate goal, the origin of life field fails - we still do not have even a plausible, coherent model, let alone a validated scenario for the origin of life on Earth. This, of course, is not due to a lack of experimental and theoretical effort, but to the extreme intrinsic difficulty and complexity of the problem. The emergence of life requires a series of highly improbable steps, from the synthesis and accumulation of nucleotides to the generation of translation; these multiplying probabilities make the outcome seem almost miraculous." [Eugene V. Koonin, molecular biologist, The Logic of Chance: The Nature and Origin of Biological Evolution (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press, 2011), 391.]

An atheist is not convinced by fiction, yet he is convinced that life came from the inanimate. Then he is convinced by fiction after all! Proverbs 14:7 Avoid a fool, for you will find no reasoning with him.

"HOW DID THE BIG BANG BEGIN?" NO ONE KNOWS. DEFINING "GOD" AS SOME KIND OF PERSON WHO COULD HAVE CREATED THE BIG BANG DOES NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION OF WHERE THIS "GOD" CAME FROM. SO WE ARE STILL IN A STATE OF IGNORANCE. 

"Understanding the operating mechanism of a Ford car is not an argument that Mr. Ford does not exist. The existence of this mechanism is not an argument that there is not a designer who designed this mechanism." /John Lennox, mathematician/

The fact that the origin of the design spirit is unknown does not in itself disprove the necessary existence of the design spirit.

THE EXISTENCE OF THE DESIGN SPIRIT

The knowledge of God extends to "By faith we understand that the world was created by the word of God, that what is visible was made out of what is invisible." - Hebrews 11:3. That is, by the creation of an intelligent, conscious, personal, spiritual Being outside of time and space.

An illustration makes it easier to understand what is at stake. Homeopathic doctors say that the exact mechanism of action of homeopathy is not known. They do not tell the truth because they conceal the fact that they energise their remedies with power from the spirit world, which has no real active ingredient. See their explanation:

"... anyone's first naïve question might be how, if the homeopath's prescribed remedy has no active ingredient at all, how can it be effective. If you think about it, after a series of dilutions with water, you would have to explain how pure water heals! (And in different ways, depending on the ancestral tincture from which we started...) The homeopathic answer to the above problem is that the dilution medium, water in this work, for simplicity, remembers the particles that it initially surrounded at the beginning of the dilution series, and more so (more strongly) the more times it was subjected to the dilution-dilution cycle. This seems to contradict common sense... it is true that in a homeopathic remedy (for example) "D25" there is no longer a single molecule of the original mother tincture, but it should be remembered that in the production of the same remedy the (increasingly dilute) solution is subjected 25 times to "strong mechanical action", i.e. shaking, rubbing, etc. During this process, the remedy interacts strongly with the walls of the holding/processing vessels and with air (and/or possibly other gaseous substances, depending on the formulation). Thus, the homeopathic remedy obtained is probably not quite pure water, but a very dilute solution of substances dissolved from the surfaces and gases that have come into contact with the dilute solution...

ENERGETIZATION A preparation will not be strong by itself, but it is necessary to strike the solution with cultic movements on a given surface after each dilution step, according to a defined protocol. But be careful, too many strokes can make the product dangerously strong! This phenomenon was observed by Hahnemann himself. Namely, he noticed that the further a patient lived from his practice, the more effective the remedy. Why? Because in those days, the roads were not as smooth as they are today, and horse-drawn carriages were still on cobblestones. The master immediately warned the doctors who followed him and his patients not to carry homeopathic remedies in their waistcoat pockets, as their effects could be amplified to a degree that was dangerous to health." /HOMEOPATHY: AN ILLUMINATING SURVIVAL OF AN UNSCIENTIFIC IDEA -  https://real-j.mtak.hu/14850/11/2018_11.pdf

It is a completely frivolous explanation that a neutral liquid can be made healing by simple shaking /mantra/. I asked a famous naturopath personally once: what happens if I shake a plastic bottle of Coca-Cola, will it have a healing effect? The answer: no! So how do they do it?

The secret is related to the real purpose of homeopathy, which is to open the higher levels of the brain to some kind of spiritual influx! Samuel Hahnemann was in fact a Freemason who rejected Christianity. He firmly maintains that homeopathic treatment is NOT by the active ingredients of the remedies used, but by spiritual forces (Organon, § 269) [See in detail: Can we believe in the dynamic life force? - https://deske.hu/iras/html-2011/homeopatia-cikk.htm]

Consequently, energising /treatment with bioenergy/ is nothing more than the infusion of spiritual forces of unknown origin into a solution that does not contain an active ingredient.

Same with the treatment by a spiritual healer: the bioenergeticist seeks to influence the energy field of his patient or client by using his own energy field. His methods include: bioenergetics, radiesthesia, ESP-based methods, USUI, Reiki, RAI Reiki (Tifar, Arolo), Human Energy Yoga, Mahikari, Biegelbauer's illumination, etc. It is a formidable repertoire of demonic influences to which ignorant patients seeking healing expose themselves.

There are two kinds of spiritual power in the universe, divine and diabolical.

 If homeopathic remedies that do not contain a healing substance do work (even on animals!), it proves the existence of spiritual forces. Since physical healing does not come from God in this age according to the Bible, it consequently comes from Satan, who is a rebellious spiritual being, the leader of demons.

2Thess 2:9 Whose coming is by the power of Satan, with all the power of lying, signs and wonders,

The atheist person is not necessarily a Satanist, but atheism was started by Satan in the Garden of Eden, which is the basic idea of secular society, that there is no Creator, that everything can be explained by the self-evolution of matter. /Let us say that if this creed is put down in writing, the self-evolution of matter is not enough, it must be formulated by the spirit, which derives its written text from the spirit, and the universe from matter, because the lesser needs the spirit, the greater does not./

They claim that the burden of proof rests on the supporters of God, not on the opponents. There is evidence that they cannot destroy, but downgrade as discreditable to them. This is where it becomes subjective, that the existence of something is decided by one's attitude towards it. If I want it, it exists, if I don't want it, it doesn't. Those who believe in it, have it, those who don't, don't.

But that's not how it works, it's decided on the facts! Where there are croissants, there must be a baker. Where there is a horseshoe, there must be a blacksmith. And where there is intellectual information, there must be an author, a writer.

"For the wrath of God from heaven is manifested against all unbelief and falsehood of men, who hold up the truth by falsehood, for that which is known of God is manifest to them, because God has made it manifest to them. For what is invisible in him, that is, his eternal power and deity, is understood and seen from the creation of the world by his works. There is therefore no excuse for them" (Romans 1:18-20).

Yet, knowing the obvious facts, you deny God? Then you face the wrath of God. That you are laughing at this now as an atheist? Today, yes, but what about tomorrow when God fulfils his promise?!

IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD AND USE MEDICINE, YOU SHOW A LACK OF FAITH.

Can you drive a car, yet you wear your seat belt? Then you show a lack of faith in your ability to drive.

REMEMBER CHILDREN, SCIENCE WILL TAKE YOU TO THE MOON, RELIGION TO THE BUILDINGS.

Science takes you to the moon where there is no oxygen, religion takes you to buildings where there is the presence of people imbued with the knowledge of God. At least hopefully.

MY PROBLEM IS WHEN PASTORS GET RICH OFF OF PEOPLE WHO COME TO CHURCH WHO ARE POOR.

 You are absolutely right about that, but these scams do not disprove the existence of God or diminish the value of Christ's teaching.

WE ARE BECAUSE WE DON'T BELIEVE IN THE MAGIC SKY.

The existence or non-existence of something does not depend on whether you believe in it or not!

Atheism denies the meaning of existence, the meaning of the heavens in particular. An atheist walks into a room where every object that exists has a purpose and a function. Only the atheist's existence has none. So what is he doing in the room? Get out of it! The smallest object with a purpose has more value than him! Get out of the room, indeed the universe.

THE NATURAL ENEMY IS THE MAN WHO WANTS TO CONTROL OTHERS, THAT'S YOUR PRIESTS.

Richard Dawkins is also very keen to lead atheists into the mire of a meaningless life.

GOD'S RULES CAN BE TAUGHT WITHOUT GOD AND WITHOUT RELIGION. THAT MAKES GOD'S RULES A LIE. THEY ARE NOT GOD'S RULES, THEY ARE RULES THAT PEOPLE MADE UP MANY YEARS AGO, CLAIMING THEY ARE GOD'S WORD. HOW COME NO NEW VERSES HAVE COME OUT IN THE LAST FEW YEARS? OR IF THEY DID, IT WAS NOT GOD, CONSIDERING IT WAS A PERSON OR MAN WHO HEARD THE WORDS OF "GOD" AND WROTE THEM DOWN.

God's rules and man's rules are fundamentally different. The atheist's rule is this: 

- I cannot believe in something, something that has not been proven to exist. To me, the Bible and God are nothing more than a fairy tale. Until there is proof, the Bible is a fictional book from antiquity. It's everyone's heart to decide what they believe, for me it's all about respecting the other's beliefs or atheism. -

It is not your lack of faith that is the problem, it is that your given case lack of faith is coupled with theft, fraud, lying, violence, thuggery, money laundering, internet crime, drug and prostitution abuse, everyday littering, and thousands of other evil acts as we see the immense torrent of crime, all of whose perpetrators live by their own morality and expect to be respected for their atheistic outlook on life. God will respect it, won't he?

Atheism is an arbitrary violation of the cohesive moral order of society, insofar as as as many atheists as there are atheists, the right to exercise self-righteous libertinage is invoked.

As an atheist, you have been freed from the perfect moral law based on LOVE, and have chosen instead the law of interest, which is the basic law of crime. Drugs, alcohol, prostitution, organ trafficking, arms trafficking and a thousand forms of lying. All forbidden by what to you is superstitious nonsense because you enjoy the freedom of crime without remorse. He who is born again in Christ is set free from sin to be ruled by sin. You have just become a slave to sin.

New verses are not coming forth because God has already given sufficient teaching to restrain sin and judge atheistic, disobedient persons.

I'VE NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHY GOD GETS UPSET WHEN PEOPLE DON'T PRAISE HIM. SUPPOSE I MAKE AN ANT FARM. THE ANTS SEEM HAPPY AND DO ANT THINGS. IF THEY DON'T PRAISE ME, I POUR SOME HOT WATER IN TO TEACH THEM A LESSON. IT MAKES ME AN ASSHOLE OF EPIC PROPORTIONS.

Earlier, we noted the ignorance of atheists due to a narrowing of judgement. Here is the example of believing that God desires the praise of men and punishes them for not praising him. Then let us repeat:

It is not your lack of faith that is the problem, it is that your given case lack of faith is coupled with theft, fraud, lying, violence, thuggery, money laundering, internet crime, drug and prostitution abuse, everyday littering, and thousands of other evil acts as we see the immense torrent of crime, all of whose perpetrators live by their own morality and expect to be respected for their atheistic outlook on life. 

Because it's not the giving or not giving of praise, it's that disobedience creates a million problems that need to be prevented or countered. Nor does the Traffic Authority punish motorists for not praising the Traffic Authority, but for not obeying traffic laws - saying the laws are there to be broken! Typical atheist attitude. 

The laws of God the Creator are there to maintain the order of creation, and those who trample on them are punished according to their transgression. This cannot be avoided by saying "I never understood". You didn't understand, because distorted moral judgement prevents you from understanding even the simplest things!

Isaiah 26:10 When the wicked receives mercy, he does not learn righteousness; in the land of the righteous he does unrighteousness, and does not consider the majesty of the LORD.

PEOPLE ARE SOVEREIGN OVER THEIR OWN LIVES, THEY MUST BE FREE TO LIVE THEIR OWN LIVES, UNMOLESTED BY THOSE WHO WOULD SUBJECT THEIR MINDS TO TYRANNY.

The gospel message is an offensive message in a lost and dying world. Freedom does not mean calling a tyrant who exposes the abuses of liberty by freethinkers and offers the prospect of punishment.

RICHARD DAWKINS FORTUNATELY LEFT A GREAT LEGACY IN HIS WRITTEN WORKS

The most famous exponent of atheistic panopticism is Richard Dawkins, who, intoxicated by his own science, staggered out of God's grace into the steaming swamp of meaningless life. This is the legacy he left to his followers.

IN FACT, VIOLENCE AND CRIME ARE NOT INCREASING, BUT DECREASING, AND SO IS THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION, BOTH AT SIMILAR RATES.

In fact, as the number of atheists increases, so does crime. The hallmark of atheists is the mass of cigarette butts littering the streets by the ton.

The self-conscious atheist doesn't throw a cigarette butt in the street. A true Christian does NOT smoke:

2Cor 7:1 Since we have such promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all uncleanness of body and spirit, and in the fear of God let us carry out our sanctification. 

How then do so many littered cigarette butts end up on the streets - a mystery!

ONE OF THE KIDS IN MY YEAR GROUP KILLED HIMSELF LAST YEAR. 5 WEEKS LATER A COUNSELLOR CAME IN AND ONE OF THE FIRST THINGS HE SAID WAS "I GUESS IT'S JUST UP TO THE GODS PLAN." I SWEAR, I'M READY TO STAND UP AND FIGHT.

Anyone who says such slanderous things /like this counselor/ is ignorant of God's teachings, but that does not give anyone the right to denigrate God's teachings. 

MY LITTLE SON MY COUSIN WAS 8 MONTHS OLD AND HAD PNEUMONIA, HE CRIED ALL NIGHT, HIS BODY TEMPERATURE WAS EXTREMELY HIGH, HE WAS COUGHING AND CRYING, BUT HIS MOTHER (MY AUNT) DECIDED TO PRAY, ALL NIGHT. MY AUNT BELIEVED IN PRAYER SO MUCH, BUT THE NEXT MORNING AROUND 6AM SHE DIED. I REALLY WISHED MY AUNT HAD TAKEN HIM TO THE HOSPITAL INSTEAD OF PRAYING. I CRIED ALL THE WAY TO THE MORGUE WHEN WE HAD TO LEAVE HIM THERE.

Nowhere in God's word does it say that a patient should not be taken to the hospital if necessary. Matthew 9:12 And Jesus, hearing this, said to them: It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.

I DON'T FEEL THAT RELIGION (OR LACK OF IT) SHOULD DEFINE A PERSON. IT SHOULD BE THE MORALS AND ETHICS OF THAT PERSON. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THIS MORAL OR ETHICAL STANCE CAN BE INFLUENCED BY A RELIGIOUS DOGMA. AND THAT IS WRONG.

In a given case, a person's morality does not preclude infanticide if the infant upsets him by crying.And biblical morality excludes it. Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faith, gentleness, self-control. - Then which person's morals and ethics does the infant survive? 

 "THE LOVE OF JESUS." WHAT THE HELL IS THIS? HAS "JESUS" EVER SAID THE SIMPLE PHRASE "I LOVE YOU" TO ANYONE? I HAVE READ THE NEW TESTAMENT MANY TIMES AND NEVER FOUND SUCH AN INSTANCE. AND EVEN IN THE SO CALLED "GOLDEN TEXT", JOHN 3:16, HE SAID "GOD LOVED". NOT HE HIMSELF, BUT GOD. AND PLEASE DON'T GIVE ME THIS "CROSS" BULLSHIT AS PROOF OF "JESUS" LOVE. A MAN CAN DIE FOR ANOTHER MAN AND NOT LOVE HIM. THE MILITARY IS PROOF OF THAT. I DON'T ENVY YOU FOR BELIEVING IN "JESUS". I JUST NEVER FELT I MATTERED TO HIM, THAT'S ALL.

John 13:1 Now before the feast of the Passover, Jesus, knowing that his hour had come to pass out of this world to the Father, because he loved his own in the world, loved them to the end.

John 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another: as I have loved you, even so love ye one another.

John 15:9-10 As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you: abide in this my love. If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love: even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

John 15:12-13 This is my commandment, that you love one another, just as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

RELIGION BLINDS YOU FROM SEEING REAL LOVE AND COMPASSION.

Religion and true Christian faith are not the same! They kill in the name of religion, but believers love in the name of Jesus.

ONE OF THE WORST THINGS I HATE ABOUT RELIGION IS THAT IT FORCES OTHERWISE DECENT PEOPLE TO JUSTIFY ATROCITIES.

It is thanks to Darwinian philosophy that the murderer's conscience kills without remorse. And in the street he throws away the garbage and scrawls on the walls. Because it forms a right to exercise free will.

YOU ARE POINTING TO A COLLECTION OF FAIRY TALES THAT HAVE NOTHING TO BACK UP THE CLAIMS, AND WE ARE ACTING AS IF WE ARE THE ONES WHO SHOULD BE REEVALUATING OUR POSITION.

That the Bible is a collection of fairy tales, what proves that? A subjective criticism from a layman?

The reliability of the Bible comes from personal investigation, while its unreliability is claimed by people who have not investigated the reliability of their own statements. Let alone the Bible.

IT IS AMAZING TO SAY THAT THERE IS NO MASS MURDER IN THE BIBLE.

Psalm 37:37-38 Take heed to the blameless, look to the upright, for the future belongs to the man of peace. But all the wicked shall perish; the end of the wicked is destruction. 

The wicked - it may be a multitude who freely choose the path of sin, sinful pleasures and the abuse of free will. - Because he knows better…

THE ORIGIN OF LIFE IS NOT PART OF EVOLUTION - WHEREVER IT COMES FROM.

That a doctor cannot account for his medical degree, whence it came, does not affect the credibility of his medical practice. The main thing is that he knows how to heal. Yet he prefers to practice quackery.

Evolution is based on the quackery of natural selection, that it is like a blind watchmaker, with as much planned control as the blowing of the wind. " ... in the operation of natural selection there is no more design than in the direction in which the wind blows... Natural selection is the blind watchmaker; blind because it cannot foresee, because it does not plan for consequences, because it has no purpose... biological evolution is essentially random wandering in a field of genetic possibilities." /Charles Darwin, Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking/

This is the exact opposite of the process of human selective breeding. However, if any complex organism can be formed by chance, why do breeders consciously select for breeds in artificial selection? Is blind random selection the same as human-directed selection?

In fact, the aim of breeding is to get as close as possible to the ideal. An essential prerequisite for good breeding is a thorough knowledge of the herd. How would natural selection know?

Special care must be taken in selecting the individuals to be used for breeding - How does natural selection select the individuals to be used for breeding? It selects for the best adaptability, not for species development and conservation. The survival of the most viable individuals is not the same as the survival of the individuals needed for a species to evolve.

Evolution in nature is about the spontaneous selection of subjects that are best adapted to their environment, with the survival and reproduction of those with the most suitable characteristics for that environment, with the aim of survival and not of achieving some strategic goal. The sick, the stunted, the underdeveloped are at a disadvantage compared to the healthy.

Selective breeding, on the other hand, relies on human intervention and is sometimes called artificial selection. It is the traditional method used by farmers to improve crop and livestock production by carefully selecting for cows that produce more milk, chickens that lay more eggs and wheat crops that produce more grain. Et cetera. 

Where do evolutionists get the idea that survivors with the traits best suited to a given environment are the same as carefully selected individuals intended for breeding? Since when is the trait and anatomy that expresses a variety trait equivalent to actual viability?

Does evolution carefully select them? With what? By randomly wandering in the field of genetic possibilities? Is this how evolution blindly evolved millions of different species from some ancient cell of unknown origin [LUCA]? Without guidance, while the very point of human selective breeding is to consciously guide the process? Darwinian evolution is ridiculous as it is! 

The essence of natural selection is the guarding of existing species within their genetic boundaries, like a natural electric shepherd, a genetic leash. A species changes within its own species, but the species remains the same. Micro-evolutionary change adapted to the environment is sufficient for survival.

The alleged new species are always variants of a particular species, like many kinds of cars and many kinds of trams, but they don't cross paths, they don't evolve from each other and engineers don't develop them from each other. Evolution is simply the practical realisation of a variation of adaptation to the existing natural environment, the validity of which has been confirmed by natural selection. 

 "Darwinism is a very nice, very positive explanation, and the world suddenly seems a much more exciting place," says Richard Dawkins, who previously referred to religion as "an organised licence to be acceptably stupid". When it is precisely Darwinian evolutionary theory that provides an organised licence to be the blatant stupidity that mainstream biology is stuck with. Do blindly controlled and consciously controlled processes have the same outcome? State-sponsored pseudoscientific schizophrenia!

They manipulate the reproductive mechanisms of existing species, by amplifying the minimal benefits of incorrectly copying genetic information. But how the initial flawless genetic apparatus produced the organisms of yore is not discussed, they skip it elegantly. The origin of genetic information is equally ignored. /The origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal mystery - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3293468/

FLY BILLIONS EAT HORSE POO, BUT I DON'T THINK I'LL BE EATING IT TOMORROW MORNING!

But it eats it in the form of evolution. - Darwinism is a fantasy product used by the atheist to make the impossible believable to the gullible. And it is consumed on a mass scale. Whatever the consequences may /are/, if it can be used to reject God, it can come. 

GETTING TO FAITH

The drug of ignorance is enjoyed by those who believe it is easy to find what can only be obtained after much searching. 

Faith that has real life-saving value for its owner has a path of spiritual components, not experiential. /Experiential is only an afterhought, butnot necessarily important - We walk by faith not by sight - 2 Cor 5:7/ This is the background of true faith: Rom 10:17 Therefore faith is by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. 

Someone studies the whole Bible, understands its context, gets the answers that are important for his spiritual preparation - and thus comes to faith, that is, to have information that guides him like a map. Faith is the possession of knowledge through an invisible map that can guide the possessor, and guide him in the right direction. The right path is established as the right path by the one from whom the revelation comes. Faith is therefore the possession of spiritual information.

The essence of atheism is the complete questioning of this life-saving belief on the basis that it is interested in nothing more than the freedom to enjoy life's opportunities according to one's own individual tastes, desires and, above all, interests. Richard Dawkins expressed it well in the following slogan: "There is probably no God, so you can enjoy life at your leisure.” There is no more primitive philosophy of life than this, and that for the masses this is a very appropriate perspective betrays the level they have reached in their futile lives.

"The whole genetic programme is at the service of DNA, not of the people themselves. We are merely temporary containers of life-bearing molecules. In this case the packaging, ourselves, is merely there to be discarded." /Rudi Westendorp, Dutch professor of genetics/ 

Darwinism condemns man as disposable rubbish. You wonder how this atheistic kind of man is based on science, is covering the entire planet with garbage?

For an atheist, confrontation is sweet, except that it will sting when confronted with the inexorable reality of the almighty god weighing him in the balance.

Mene, Mene, Tekel, Ufarsin! You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting.- Daniel 5:25-27